A Tale of Two …

February 7, 2012

As I initiated my morning routine today, the BBC World Service informed me that today is Charles Dickens’ 200th anniversary. Later on, as I googled a technical term at the office, Google informed me of that as well by altering their home page into cute Dickens-themed characters embedded and merged around their logo.

Okay, I enjoy Dickens as much as the next Anglo but these days; I am more anxious to see how the uprisings in Syria will transition into a full blown certified civil war and from there, who knows how it will proliferate. I am already outraged that, unlike his fellow dictators, Al-Assad, has not been forced to step down, was not heavily sanctioned and was obviously not murdered.

Chuck D. will have an anniversary next year, and if by then Iran is in the midst of nuking you know who, then he will have another one the following year….and the following year…

Bref, although the Holidays were long gone, I realized that I was being somewhat of a Scrooge. I could still enjoy a light subject even in these times of crisis and unrest without feeling guilty. After giving it some thoughts, I understood that Dickens did not represent anything trivial. He was extremely socially involved, especially for the Victorian times he lived in. Dickens, a political journalist, understood the lower classes, despised greed for money and promoted social reform.

Wait, isn’t that a reflection on the situation in Syria? No coincidences after all – Synchronicities (yes it is one of the categories of my blog…lol).

Could Dickens have been reincarnated as a non-Alawite Syrian, leading the uprising?

After researching more about his “power to the people and justice for all” stance, I shockingly discovered that his views were only to be applied to certain nations. Actually only to two nations: the British and their American cousins.

He was so full of hate that some of his writings clearly display anti-Italian, anti-Irish, anti-Zulu and anti-Amerindian views. But he was most notorious for his anti-Indian rants. He left no room for misunderstandings or excuses as he went as far as calling for the extermination of the Indian race and applauded the mutilation of Hindus who were punished by being blown from English guns.

And I quote: “I wish I were commander-in-chief in India … I should proclaim to them that I considered my holding that appointment by the leave of God, to mean that I should do my utmost to exterminate the race.”

I wonder why his work has not been banned in many countries. Not only it has not but also, he is admired (or conditioned to be admired) all over the world; proclaimed as a legend and a genius. I guess talent and good century old marketing teams can change things around.

If I were more informed in high school, I would have not chosen “A Tale of Two Cities” (which is over 500 pages damn it!) for my essay at the time.

Dickens doesn’t sound so trivial after all. What would Bashar Al-Assad say to that? Not so different after all.

“I wore black because I liked it. I still do, and wearing it still means something to me. It’s still my symbol of rebellion – against a stagnant status quo, against our hypocritical houses of God, against people whose minds are closed to others’ ideas.

I wear black for the poor and the beaten down, the prisoner who has long paid for his crime, for those who never read or listened to the words that Jesus said. For the sick and lonely, in mournin’ for the lives that could have been. For the thousands who have died, believen’ that the Lord was on their side.

I’d love to wear a rainbow every day, and tell the world that everything’s OK, but I’ll try to carry off a little darkness on my back, until things are brighter, I’m the Man in Black.

– Johnny Cash

The above picture was taken at the Folsom State Prison, in 1966, following the success of “Folsom Prison Blues”, which is one of my favorite Johnny Cash songs.

Copyright © 2012 Thus Always To Genius. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “A Tale of Two …”

  1. EdC said

    I like this post even though you trash my favorite author. I believe we have to separate the man and his work. Liking one’s work doesn’t mean I like or even agree with the man. For example, I really like R.Kelly’s music but I don’t like the fact that he likes little girls.

    • Woody Allen came to Roman Polanski’s defense, along with the majority of Hollywood and European artists. Come to think of it, Woody wasn’t perhaps the best front man for the cause. But hey, at the end of the day, seems as immorality might be a necessary variable in the equation that leads to immortality. Love them both myself, so I completely understand how one wants to disregard a person’s transgression in order to fully enjoy their work …. But if they were pumping gas in Ohio, might be a different story.

  2. […] reminiscent of Charles Dickens, regardless on the education received, classical or not, Shakespeare has always been drilled into […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: